<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 789 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106218</link>
    <description>Tribunal, in compliance with a Madras HC direction, prepared and forwarded a statement of case on whether measuring instruments qualify as capital goods for the purpose of Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as it stood before 16-3-1995. The Registry was directed to send the statement to the High Court Registrar and furnish copies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 789 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106218</link>
      <description>Tribunal, in compliance with a Madras HC direction, prepared and forwarded a statement of case on whether measuring instruments qualify as capital goods for the purpose of Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as it stood before 16-3-1995. The Registry was directed to send the statement to the High Court Registrar and furnish copies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>