<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 384 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106216</link>
    <description>A writ petition cannot be summarily dismissed when material objections to the challenged order remain unanswered. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court disposed of the matter without dealing with substantive contentions concerning the legality of seizure, tax collection, and the Tribunal&#039;s handling of the dispute. Because the controversy involved disputed issues requiring examination, such abrupt disposal was inadequate. The impugned order was therefore set aside, and the writ petition was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law, without any expression on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 384 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106216</link>
      <description>A writ petition cannot be summarily dismissed when material objections to the challenged order remain unanswered. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court disposed of the matter without dealing with substantive contentions concerning the legality of seizure, tax collection, and the Tribunal&#039;s handling of the dispute. Because the controversy involved disputed issues requiring examination, such abrupt disposal was inadequate. The impugned order was therefore set aside, and the writ petition was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law, without any expression on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>