<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 782 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106208</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on capital goods could not be denied merely because clinker production had not yet been commissioned, where the machinery was purchased for erection work, declarations were filed, and the credit was taken and utilised in the manufacturing process. The applicable rule prohibited credit only before the capital goods were installed or used for manufacture of excisable goods, so the timing of availment had to be measured against installation and use, not against commercial commissioning of the plant. On that basis, denial of credit was inconsistent with the rule, and the assessee was entitled to the credit and consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 782 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106208</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on capital goods could not be denied merely because clinker production had not yet been commissioned, where the machinery was purchased for erection work, declarations were filed, and the credit was taken and utilised in the manufacturing process. The applicable rule prohibited credit only before the capital goods were installed or used for manufacture of excisable goods, so the timing of availment had to be measured against installation and use, not against commercial commissioning of the plant. On that basis, denial of credit was inconsistent with the rule, and the assessee was entitled to the credit and consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>