<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106186</link>
    <description>Purchases of cashew kernels claimed as export-related purchases could be exempt only if the assessee established, through trading accounts, purchase details, export orders, invoices, bills of lading and related records, that the purchases were integrally connected with export under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The records before the assessing and appellate authorities did not contain a proper factual finding on whether the purchases were in the course of export, so the applicability of the earlier precedent could not be decided on the existing material. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh factual determination, with the question of liability under section 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act left open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106186</link>
      <description>Purchases of cashew kernels claimed as export-related purchases could be exempt only if the assessee established, through trading accounts, purchase details, export orders, invoices, bills of lading and related records, that the purchases were integrally connected with export under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The records before the assessing and appellate authorities did not contain a proper factual finding on whether the purchases were in the course of export, so the applicability of the earlier precedent could not be decided on the existing material. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh factual determination, with the question of liability under section 5A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act left open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>