<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 756 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106175</link>
    <description>Concessional customs exemption under Notification No. 20/95-Cus. was available for the imported catalyst because the exclusion for nickel based naphtha steam reformation catalyst was construed strictly. Product literature, supplier descriptions, certificates and expert opinion showed the goods were suitable only for pre-reforming at lower temperature, not steam reforming. The record did not establish that the goods fell within the exclusion, and the contrary inference drawn by the lower authority was rejected. The catalyst was therefore eligible for the notification benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:38:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 756 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106175</link>
      <description>Concessional customs exemption under Notification No. 20/95-Cus. was available for the imported catalyst because the exclusion for nickel based naphtha steam reformation catalyst was construed strictly. Product literature, supplier descriptions, certificates and expert opinion showed the goods were suitable only for pre-reforming at lower temperature, not steam reforming. The record did not establish that the goods fell within the exclusion, and the contrary inference drawn by the lower authority was rejected. The catalyst was therefore eligible for the notification benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>