<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 755 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106173</link>
    <description>Items such as Freon TMS, AccuGuard Replenisher and Starter Solution, de-oxidising fluids, and record device and record announcement were treated as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because the Tribunal followed earlier decisions on similar products, including the line of authority in AB Tools, and found no reason to depart from the settled view. The disputed items were therefore held eligible inputs for Modvat purposes, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 755 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106173</link>
      <description>Items such as Freon TMS, AccuGuard Replenisher and Starter Solution, de-oxidising fluids, and record device and record announcement were treated as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because the Tribunal followed earlier decisions on similar products, including the line of authority in AB Tools, and found no reason to depart from the settled view. The disputed items were therefore held eligible inputs for Modvat purposes, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>