<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 555 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106168</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 stays civil and recovery proceedings, including winding up, execution, distress, receivership, and suits for recovery of money, but it does not extend to criminal prosecution under the Penal Code. A prosecution under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged non-payment of collected sales tax is not a recovery proceeding and does not fall within &quot;execution, distress or the like&quot;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 555 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106168</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 stays civil and recovery proceedings, including winding up, execution, distress, receivership, and suits for recovery of money, but it does not extend to criminal prosecution under the Penal Code. A prosecution under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged non-payment of collected sales tax is not a recovery proceeding and does not fall within &quot;execution, distress or the like&quot;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>