<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1166 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106138</link>
    <description>The appeal for restoration was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai. The Tribunal upheld the decision to dismiss the appeal due to failure to deposit the required sum, despite claims of financial hardship. The applications for restoration were ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1166 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106138</link>
      <description>The appeal for restoration was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai. The Tribunal upheld the decision to dismiss the appeal due to failure to deposit the required sum, despite claims of financial hardship. The applications for restoration were ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>