<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1160 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order to enhance the value of the imported goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of transaction value unless proven otherwise, as per the provisions of Rule 4 and relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1160 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order to enhance the value of the imported goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of transaction value unless proven otherwise, as per the provisions of Rule 4 and relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>