<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 489 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106105</link>
    <description>Mosquito repellants and allied products were considered in relation to Entry 44(5) of Schedule III to the Kerala VAT Act, 2003, read with Section 6(1)(a), and the proper use of HSN-based classification. The Court noted that the earlier decision had not fully considered the effect of HSN alignment under the statutory scheme, the corresponding Customs Tariff classification, and the omission of the figure &quot;3808&quot; from the entry by the Kerala Finance Act, 2006. The classification issue therefore required fresh examination on the statutory materials, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration without any opinion on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 489 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106105</link>
      <description>Mosquito repellants and allied products were considered in relation to Entry 44(5) of Schedule III to the Kerala VAT Act, 2003, read with Section 6(1)(a), and the proper use of HSN-based classification. The Court noted that the earlier decision had not fully considered the effect of HSN alignment under the statutory scheme, the corresponding Customs Tariff classification, and the omission of the figure &quot;3808&quot; from the entry by the Kerala Finance Act, 2006. The classification issue therefore required fresh examination on the statutory materials, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration without any opinion on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>