<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 903 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106082</link>
    <description>A creditor&#039;s dues shown in a company&#039;s balance-sheet as unsecured loans could not be treated as adjusted against the company&#039;s losses without the creditor&#039;s concurrence. The Gujarat HC held that any arrangement said to have been made by outgoing directors after a change in management could not bind the creditors, and the company court&#039;s reliance on alleged silence to support that adjustment was unsound. Because several factual matters needed reconsideration on the existing record, the rejection of the company petitions for winding up was unsustainable and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 903 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106082</link>
      <description>A creditor&#039;s dues shown in a company&#039;s balance-sheet as unsecured loans could not be treated as adjusted against the company&#039;s losses without the creditor&#039;s concurrence. The Gujarat HC held that any arrangement said to have been made by outgoing directors after a change in management could not bind the creditors, and the company court&#039;s reliance on alleged silence to support that adjustment was unsound. Because several factual matters needed reconsideration on the existing record, the rejection of the company petitions for winding up was unsustainable and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>