<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 895 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106074</link>
    <description>A company may be wound up for inability to pay its admitted debt where the debt is not disputed and no effective rebuttal is filed after due service and publication. Here, the respondent-company admitted liability, yet filed no reply or counter-affidavit to contest the claim despite service under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1956. The Court treated the admitted default as sufficient to establish inability to pay under the Companies Act, 1956, and held that winding up was warranted. The winding-up petition succeeded, and the Official Liquidator was directed to proceed as liquidator in accordance with the applicable rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:38:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 895 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106074</link>
      <description>A company may be wound up for inability to pay its admitted debt where the debt is not disputed and no effective rebuttal is filed after due service and publication. Here, the respondent-company admitted liability, yet filed no reply or counter-affidavit to contest the claim despite service under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1956. The Court treated the admitted default as sufficient to establish inability to pay under the Companies Act, 1956, and held that winding up was warranted. The winding-up petition succeeded, and the Official Liquidator was directed to proceed as liquidator in accordance with the applicable rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>