<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 454 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106058</link>
    <description>Rule 29(xii) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Rules, 1949 was construed to allow deduction of the purchase value of raw material bought from exempted units because the expression &quot;goods which have been subjected to tax&quot; under section 5(1A) was not limited to goods that had actually borne tax payment. The statutory scheme distinguished levy, assessment, and the point of taxation, and the exemption available to the eligible unit was treated as an exemption from payability, not from assessment. On that construction, the assessee was entitled to the deduction and the department&#039;s narrower reading was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 454 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106058</link>
      <description>Rule 29(xii) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Rules, 1949 was construed to allow deduction of the purchase value of raw material bought from exempted units because the expression &quot;goods which have been subjected to tax&quot; under section 5(1A) was not limited to goods that had actually borne tax payment. The statutory scheme distinguished levy, assessment, and the point of taxation, and the exemption available to the eligible unit was treated as an exemption from payability, not from assessment. On that construction, the assessee was entitled to the deduction and the department&#039;s narrower reading was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>