<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1030 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the importer&#039;s plea for leniency, accepted the shipment date policy, and found excess quantity liable for confiscation and penalty. Emphasizing the inclusion of demurrage in profit margin calculation, the Tribunal directed the importer to clear goods, pay security and duty pending appeal hearing, critiquing the Commissioner&#039;s lack of leniency and mathematical understanding. The departmental representative supported the Commissioner&#039;s reasoning, while the applicant sought goods release due to demurrage impact on the project, with issues of delay attribution and departmental charges accountability raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1030 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the importer&#039;s plea for leniency, accepted the shipment date policy, and found excess quantity liable for confiscation and penalty. Emphasizing the inclusion of demurrage in profit margin calculation, the Tribunal directed the importer to clear goods, pay security and duty pending appeal hearing, critiquing the Commissioner&#039;s lack of leniency and mathematical understanding. The departmental representative supported the Commissioner&#039;s reasoning, while the applicant sought goods release due to demurrage impact on the project, with issues of delay attribution and departmental charges accountability raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>