<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1020 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106039</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted, and recovery was stayed pending appeal, because the record showed a strong prima facie case in favour of the appellants. The unit had exported goods and sought debonding, while closure and export-obligation issues remained pending before the competent authority. The customs authorities had not shown a definite conclusion by the Development Commissioner, and the departmental letter relied on required duty confirmation only after such conclusion. Balance of convenience and equity favoured the appellants, and the confiscation of imported and indigenous capital goods and raw materials was treated as sufficient protection for the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1020 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106039</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted, and recovery was stayed pending appeal, because the record showed a strong prima facie case in favour of the appellants. The unit had exported goods and sought debonding, while closure and export-obligation issues remained pending before the competent authority. The customs authorities had not shown a definite conclusion by the Development Commissioner, and the departmental letter relied on required duty confirmation only after such conclusion. Balance of convenience and equity favoured the appellants, and the confiscation of imported and indigenous capital goods and raw materials was treated as sufficient protection for the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>