<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 983 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106025</link>
    <description>A four-day delay in filing an appeal was treated as adequately explained where the proprietor&#039;s illness was supported by a medical certificate. The dismissal of the appeal merely because the condonation application was not filed with the appeal papers was found unjustified. On that basis, the delay was condoned and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 983 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106025</link>
      <description>A four-day delay in filing an appeal was treated as adequately explained where the proprietor&#039;s illness was supported by a medical certificate. The dismissal of the appeal merely because the condonation application was not filed with the appeal papers was found unjustified. On that basis, the delay was condoned and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>