https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106010 At the cognizance stage, a Magistrate is not required to pass a detailed order, but the order should show some application of mind to the complaint material; a cryptic order alone does not justify quashing where the complaint discloses offences and supporting material. Proceedings against company directors also will not be quashed at the threshold merely because their responsibility is disputed, since the question whether they were in charge of and responsible for the business is primarily factual and must ordinarily be tested at trial. On that basis, the quashing petition failed. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:05:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106010 At the cognizance stage, a Magistrate is not required to pass a detailed order, but the order should show some application of mind to the complaint material; a cryptic order alone does not justify quashing where the complaint discloses offences and supporting material. Proceedings against company directors also will not be quashed at the threshold merely because their responsibility is disputed, since the question whether they were in charge of and responsible for the business is primarily factual and must ordinarily be tested at trial. On that basis, the quashing petition failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106010