<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 605 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106003</link>
    <description>Article 276(2) imposes a constitutional ceiling on the amount recoverable in respect of any one person, but it does not prevent the Legislature from defining the taxable unit for profession tax. The power to levy profession tax under entry 60 of List II includes competence to create an artificial statutory deeming provision for assessment and collection, so long as the constitutional limit is respected. On that basis, the Andhra Pradesh provisions deeming each branch of a firm, company, corporation, society, club or association to be a separate person and separate assessee were analysed as a permissible method of fixing the tax unit, not as a breach of article 276(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 605 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106003</link>
      <description>Article 276(2) imposes a constitutional ceiling on the amount recoverable in respect of any one person, but it does not prevent the Legislature from defining the taxable unit for profession tax. The power to levy profession tax under entry 60 of List II includes competence to create an artificial statutory deeming provision for assessment and collection, so long as the constitutional limit is respected. On that basis, the Andhra Pradesh provisions deeming each branch of a firm, company, corporation, society, club or association to be a separate person and separate assessee were analysed as a permissible method of fixing the tax unit, not as a breach of article 276(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>