<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 925 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105998</link>
    <description>Printed soap wrappers were treated as articles of paper rather than as mere paper or paperboard. On that classification, the Modvat credit restriction in Notification No. 177/86-C.E., as amended, which applied only to paper and paperboards, did not cover the inputs. The demand for differential credit based on excess availed Modvat credit therefore could not be sustained, and credit on the printed wrappers remained admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 925 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105998</link>
      <description>Printed soap wrappers were treated as articles of paper rather than as mere paper or paperboard. On that classification, the Modvat credit restriction in Notification No. 177/86-C.E., as amended, which applied only to paper and paperboards, did not cover the inputs. The demand for differential credit based on excess availed Modvat credit therefore could not be sustained, and credit on the printed wrappers remained admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>