<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 680 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105981</link>
    <description>Rule 196 could not sustain a demand where goods obtained under Chapter X were fully accounted for and used for packing the assessee&#039;s product. The provision applies only to accounting defaults in respect of Chapter X goods, not to a separate objection that exemption under Notification No. 181/88-C.E. was unavailable. If any demand was otherwise maintainable, it had to be raised under the appropriate provision, not under Rule 196. The demand under Rule 196 was therefore set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 680 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105981</link>
      <description>Rule 196 could not sustain a demand where goods obtained under Chapter X were fully accounted for and used for packing the assessee&#039;s product. The provision applies only to accounting defaults in respect of Chapter X goods, not to a separate objection that exemption under Notification No. 181/88-C.E. was unavailable. If any demand was otherwise maintainable, it had to be raised under the appropriate provision, not under Rule 196. The demand under Rule 196 was therefore set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>