<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 782 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105976</link>
    <description>Compliance with statutory notice for winding up was treated as established where receipt of the notice was not effectively denied, so the maintainability objection failed. The court also held that the affidavit and supporting claim documents, including received and encashed demand drafts, provided an adequate evidentiary foundation for the petition, so the challenge to affidavit sufficiency was rejected. On interest, in the absence of a contractual rate, section 2(b) of the Interest Act, 1978 was applied and the award was reduced from 18% to 9% per annum from the date of demand by reference to the relevant current fixed deposit rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:51:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 782 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105976</link>
      <description>Compliance with statutory notice for winding up was treated as established where receipt of the notice was not effectively denied, so the maintainability objection failed. The court also held that the affidavit and supporting claim documents, including received and encashed demand drafts, provided an adequate evidentiary foundation for the petition, so the challenge to affidavit sufficiency was rejected. On interest, in the absence of a contractual rate, section 2(b) of the Interest Act, 1978 was applied and the award was reduced from 18% to 9% per annum from the date of demand by reference to the relevant current fixed deposit rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>