<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 908 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105961</link>
    <description>The court granted the appointment of a receiver sought by ICICI in Suit No. 3636 of 1999, despite contestation due to potential adverse effects on the company. ICICI&#039;s submission against appointing a Liquidator was accepted, emphasizing the company&#039;s revival plans and the need to avoid hindering these efforts. The court noted ICICI&#039;s contradictory stance on secured and unsecured creditors, finding their argument unjustified. The judges&#039; summons were made absolute in favor of the petitioners, directing the continuation of the injunction until the Liquidator takes possession, with a rejection of the stay request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 908 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105961</link>
      <description>The court granted the appointment of a receiver sought by ICICI in Suit No. 3636 of 1999, despite contestation due to potential adverse effects on the company. ICICI&#039;s submission against appointing a Liquidator was accepted, emphasizing the company&#039;s revival plans and the need to avoid hindering these efforts. The court noted ICICI&#039;s contradictory stance on secured and unsecured creditors, finding their argument unjustified. The judges&#039; summons were made absolute in favor of the petitioners, directing the continuation of the injunction until the Liquidator takes possession, with a rejection of the stay request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>