<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 897 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for further adjudication. It emphasized the importance of public notification of duty impositions for legal enforceability, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s stance. The case highlighted the need for factual evidence to determine the awareness of both the importer and Revenue regarding the duty imposition, stressing that the rate of duty applicable is that on the date of actual removal of goods from the warehouse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 897 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for further adjudication. It emphasized the importance of public notification of duty impositions for legal enforceability, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s stance. The case highlighted the need for factual evidence to determine the awareness of both the importer and Revenue regarding the duty imposition, stressing that the rate of duty applicable is that on the date of actual removal of goods from the warehouse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>