<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 283 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105955</link>
    <description>Purchase tax under section 9 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 was not leviable where goods bought by a branch office in Haryana were moved to the head office and then exported pursuant to foreign orders. The Court treated the inter-office movement as occasioned by the export arrangement and not as a separate taxable movement between branch and head office. It held that the authorities had wrongly disconnected the Haryana-to-Calcutta transfer from the export transaction and had misapplied the export-sale principle without considering the factual setting. The movement was therefore in the course of export out of India and outside tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 283 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105955</link>
      <description>Purchase tax under section 9 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 was not leviable where goods bought by a branch office in Haryana were moved to the head office and then exported pursuant to foreign orders. The Court treated the inter-office movement as occasioned by the export arrangement and not as a separate taxable movement between branch and head office. It held that the authorities had wrongly disconnected the Haryana-to-Calcutta transfer from the export transaction and had misapplied the export-sale principle without considering the factual setting. The movement was therefore in the course of export out of India and outside tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>