https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105954 The court addressed a dispute over sealed premises claimed by the applicant, previously leased to a company in liquidation. The applicant sought possession under the Bombay Rents Act due to non-payment of rent and ceased business activities. The court considered the necessity of the premises for winding up proceedings based on a Supreme Court precedent. It was found that the company was not in possession at the time of winding up, leading to the dismissal of one application and the approval of the other. The court directed the Official Liquidator to take charge of any assets found in the sealed premises. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:14:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105954 The court addressed a dispute over sealed premises claimed by the applicant, previously leased to a company in liquidation. The applicant sought possession under the Bombay Rents Act due to non-payment of rent and ceased business activities. The court considered the necessity of the premises for winding up proceedings based on a Supreme Court precedent. It was found that the company was not in possession at the time of winding up, leading to the dismissal of one application and the approval of the other. The court directed the Official Liquidator to take charge of any assets found in the sealed premises. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105954