<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 899 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105944</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the legitimacy of a consent order dated May 25, 1999. The court upheld the binding nature of consent orders, stating that appeals are only permissible on questions of law, not findings of fact. It affirmed the Company Law Board&#039;s discretionary powers and jurisdiction, emphasizing limited appellate interference unless there is a miscarriage of justice. The appeal was deemed time-barred and not maintainable, with the court finding no grounds for interference in the Board&#039;s decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:02:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 899 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105944</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the legitimacy of a consent order dated May 25, 1999. The court upheld the binding nature of consent orders, stating that appeals are only permissible on questions of law, not findings of fact. It affirmed the Company Law Board&#039;s discretionary powers and jurisdiction, emphasizing limited appellate interference unless there is a miscarriage of justice. The appeal was deemed time-barred and not maintainable, with the court finding no grounds for interference in the Board&#039;s decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>