<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 325 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105943</link>
    <description>The court found the notification issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, levying different rates of entertainment tax on Telugu and non-Telugu films, to be discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court struck down the levy, ruling that the petitioner must pay tax at the rate applicable to Telugu films. The writ petition was allowed with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 325 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105943</link>
      <description>The court found the notification issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, levying different rates of entertainment tax on Telugu and non-Telugu films, to be discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court struck down the levy, ruling that the petitioner must pay tax at the rate applicable to Telugu films. The writ petition was allowed with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>