<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 601 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105934</link>
    <description>Declared invoice value for imported components was accepted as the assessable value because the record showed computerized invoicing, price revisions, and invoices raised on the prevailing price list at the time of invoicing. The Tribunal held that a difference between earlier purchase order values and invoice values did not, by itself, establish deliberate suppression, undervaluation, or misdeclaration. On that basis, the customs duty demand and penalty were not sustainable, and the assessee&#039;s declared value prevailed under the customs valuation framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 601 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105934</link>
      <description>Declared invoice value for imported components was accepted as the assessable value because the record showed computerized invoicing, price revisions, and invoices raised on the prevailing price list at the time of invoicing. The Tribunal held that a difference between earlier purchase order values and invoice values did not, by itself, establish deliberate suppression, undervaluation, or misdeclaration. On that basis, the customs duty demand and penalty were not sustainable, and the assessee&#039;s declared value prevailed under the customs valuation framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>