https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105925 The appeal involved a dispute over nominee status and entitlement to a maturity amount in a National Savings Scheme account. The court upheld the District Consumer Forum's decision, ruling in favor of the complainants as nominees despite the nomination not being recorded on the passbook due to the bank clerk's oversight. The bank was held responsible for the deficiency in service, and the opposite party's appeal was dismissed, affirming the original judgment and imposing costs on the appellant. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105925 The appeal involved a dispute over nominee status and entitlement to a maturity amount in a National Savings Scheme account. The court upheld the District Consumer Forum's decision, ruling in favor of the complainants as nominees despite the nomination not being recorded on the passbook due to the bank clerk's oversight. The bank was held responsible for the deficiency in service, and the opposite party's appeal was dismissed, affirming the original judgment and imposing costs on the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105925