<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 438 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105921</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai found the impugned order deficient for lacking essential components of a speaking order, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. Citing judgments from various High Courts, it stressed the need for orders to provide reasons establishing a rational nexus between facts and conclusions. The Tribunal set aside the order, directing a de novo consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) to address all points raised and issue a speaking order. It highlighted recent deficiencies in orders, allowed the appeals, remanded proceedings, and emphasized the importance of speaking orders for fair adjudication. Stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:54:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 438 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105921</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai found the impugned order deficient for lacking essential components of a speaking order, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles. Citing judgments from various High Courts, it stressed the need for orders to provide reasons establishing a rational nexus between facts and conclusions. The Tribunal set aside the order, directing a de novo consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) to address all points raised and issue a speaking order. It highlighted recent deficiencies in orders, allowed the appeals, remanded proceedings, and emphasized the importance of speaking orders for fair adjudication. Stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>