https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105905 Preventive detention orders may be interfered with at the pre-execution stage only in narrow exceptional categories, such as want of jurisdiction, wrong person, wrong purpose, vague or irrelevant grounds, or action by an incompetent authority. Mere delay in passing or executing the order is not by itself sufficient to quash it unless the delay is unexplained and the case otherwise falls within those limited exceptions. Non-disclosure of an earlier withdrawn writ petition was a serious lapse, but the challenge still could not succeed on the delay-based grounds relied upon. The detention order was restored, while other permissible grounds were left open if enforcement is later sought. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Dec 2022 18:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105905 Preventive detention orders may be interfered with at the pre-execution stage only in narrow exceptional categories, such as want of jurisdiction, wrong person, wrong purpose, vague or irrelevant grounds, or action by an incompetent authority. Mere delay in passing or executing the order is not by itself sufficient to quash it unless the delay is unexplained and the case otherwise falls within those limited exceptions. Non-disclosure of an earlier withdrawn writ petition was a serious lapse, but the challenge still could not succeed on the delay-based grounds relied upon. The detention order was restored, while other permissible grounds were left open if enforcement is later sought. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105905