https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105904 A non-speaking lump sum arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 was upheld because both parties had adequate opportunity, the arbitration clause was wide enough to cover the disputes, and no recognised ground under sections 30 and 33 was shown to justify interference; the court would not reappraise evidence or probe the arbitrator's mental process. The pre-decree interest award was sustained, pendente lite interest was not granted because it had not been claimed or argued before the High Court, and future interest from the date of decree was allowed at 12 per cent per annum until payment. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Apr 2020 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105904 A non-speaking lump sum arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 was upheld because both parties had adequate opportunity, the arbitration clause was wide enough to cover the disputes, and no recognised ground under sections 30 and 33 was shown to justify interference; the court would not reappraise evidence or probe the arbitrator's mental process. The pre-decree interest award was sustained, pendente lite interest was not granted because it had not been claimed or argued before the High Court, and future interest from the date of decree was allowed at 12 per cent per annum until payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105904