<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 558 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105901</link>
    <description>Sale price of steel sheet cuttings and remnants sold by the manufacturer was the correct assessable value for excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. In the absence of any allegation in the show cause notice, or finding in the impugned order, that the buyer relationship was non-commercial or that price was not the sole consideration, the statutory scheme required adoption of the transaction value. The duty demands based on a different valuation method were therefore unsustainable, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 558 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105901</link>
      <description>Sale price of steel sheet cuttings and remnants sold by the manufacturer was the correct assessable value for excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. In the absence of any allegation in the show cause notice, or finding in the impugned order, that the buyer relationship was non-commercial or that price was not the sole consideration, the statutory scheme required adoption of the transaction value. The duty demands based on a different valuation method were therefore unsustainable, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>