<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 562 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105898</link>
    <description>An adjudication order was held to be vitiated where it relied on an expert panel report prepared after the hearing and never furnished to the appellant. Since the appellant had no opportunity to meet material generated post-hearing, the reliance on that undisclosed report amounted to a breach of natural justice. The order was set aside and the matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh determination in compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 562 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105898</link>
      <description>An adjudication order was held to be vitiated where it relied on an expert panel report prepared after the hearing and never furnished to the appellant. Since the appellant had no opportunity to meet material generated post-hearing, the reliance on that undisclosed report amounted to a breach of natural justice. The order was set aside and the matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh determination in compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>