https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105867 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 cannot be used to direct regulatory bodies to frame or modify broad policy on share pricing or premium; the court may examine and remedy specific administrative actions pleaded within the four corners of a petition but must refrain from issuing general policy directions that fall within the exclusive domain of the executive/regulators. Consequently, wide-ranging requests in a public interest petition for regulatory policy formulation were rejected and relief was denied to the petitioner in favour of the respondent. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:34:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105867 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 cannot be used to direct regulatory bodies to frame or modify broad policy on share pricing or premium; the court may examine and remedy specific administrative actions pleaded within the four corners of a petition but must refrain from issuing general policy directions that fall within the exclusive domain of the executive/regulators. Consequently, wide-ranging requests in a public interest petition for regulatory policy formulation were rejected and relief was denied to the petitioner in favour of the respondent. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105867