https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105865 Territorial jurisdiction was unavailable to the Calcutta consumer forum in a dispute concerning transfer and registration of share certificates, because the relevant cause of action arose where the company's registered office was situated in Mumbai. The maintainability objection was based on the place where the share register was maintained and the transfer process was effected, but the governing principle treated the registered office as the ative jurisdictional link. The complaint therefore could not be entertained by the Calcutta forum for want of territorial jurisdiction, and the objection succeeded. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105865 Territorial jurisdiction was unavailable to the Calcutta consumer forum in a dispute concerning transfer and registration of share certificates, because the relevant cause of action arose where the company's registered office was situated in Mumbai. The maintainability objection was based on the place where the share register was maintained and the transfer process was effected, but the governing principle treated the registered office as the ative jurisdictional link. The complaint therefore could not be entertained by the Calcutta forum for want of territorial jurisdiction, and the objection succeeded. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105865