https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105860 A cease and desist order under the MRTP Act required prior disclosure of the full case in the notice and particulars, because an order with civil consequences could not rest on an allegation not put to the appellant, including the Jain General Stores complaint. The order also failed because the record did not contain an affirmative finding that the impugned conduct had the effect of preventing, distorting or restricting competition, or of imposing unjustified costs or restrictions on consumers under section 2(o). On those grounds, the adverse order was set aside and no operative restraint remained against the appellant. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105860 A cease and desist order under the MRTP Act required prior disclosure of the full case in the notice and particulars, because an order with civil consequences could not rest on an allegation not put to the appellant, including the Jain General Stores complaint. The order also failed because the record did not contain an affirmative finding that the impugned conduct had the effect of preventing, distorting or restricting competition, or of imposing unjustified costs or restrictions on consumers under section 2(o). On those grounds, the adverse order was set aside and no operative restraint remained against the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105860