<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 587 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105850</link>
    <description>The court determined that imported goods declared as secondary hot rolled stainless steel sheets/plates were not of prime quality, overturning the impugned order. It emphasized the need for comprehensive testing beyond visual inspection and found discrepancies despite meeting chemical requirements. The examination process by the Custom House was scrutinized, with the court concluding that the goods were indeed secondary goods, rendering confiscation, duty recovery, and penalty unsustainable. The reversal of the impugned order was based on detailed analysis of examination reports and testing discrepancies, leading to the appeals being allowed and consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 587 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105850</link>
      <description>The court determined that imported goods declared as secondary hot rolled stainless steel sheets/plates were not of prime quality, overturning the impugned order. It emphasized the need for comprehensive testing beyond visual inspection and found discrepancies despite meeting chemical requirements. The examination process by the Custom House was scrutinized, with the court concluding that the goods were indeed secondary goods, rendering confiscation, duty recovery, and penalty unsustainable. The reversal of the impugned order was based on detailed analysis of examination reports and testing discrepancies, leading to the appeals being allowed and consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>