<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 858 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105847</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioners to seek appropriate jurisdiction under the Companies Act. The interim order was vacated, and no costs were awarded. The judgment emphasized the necessity of addressing the validity of the bond transfers and the payment of interest through proper legal channels, not through writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 858 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105847</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioners to seek appropriate jurisdiction under the Companies Act. The interim order was vacated, and no costs were awarded. The judgment emphasized the necessity of addressing the validity of the bond transfers and the payment of interest through proper legal channels, not through writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>