<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 585 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105846</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the inadmissibility of crucial evidence and the pending issue of unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the importance of timely submission of evidence and separate consideration of legal issues as per the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 585 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105846</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the inadmissibility of crucial evidence and the pending issue of unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the importance of timely submission of evidence and separate consideration of legal issues as per the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>