<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 856 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105845</link>
    <description>For complaints alleging non-supply of documents under the Companies Act, territorial jurisdiction lies where the company&#039;s registered office is situated and where the statutory duty to dispatch the documents is to be performed. On that principle, a Bangalore court could not entertain the complaint when the registered office was at Mangalore and the alleged default arose there. The proper forum was the Magistrate at Mangalore, and the complaint was to be returned for presentation before the competent court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 856 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105845</link>
      <description>For complaints alleging non-supply of documents under the Companies Act, territorial jurisdiction lies where the company&#039;s registered office is situated and where the statutory duty to dispatch the documents is to be performed. On that principle, a Bangalore court could not entertain the complaint when the registered office was at Mangalore and the alleged default arose there. The proper forum was the Magistrate at Mangalore, and the complaint was to be returned for presentation before the competent court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>