https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105842 Continued occupation of company accommodation after cessation of employment was treated as attracting Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, where the premises belonged to the company and had been allotted during service. The High Court declined revisional interference because the concurrent factual findings of the courts below showed no infirmity warranting reappraisal. At the same time, the occupants were granted further time to vacate the premises, with liberty to pursue civil remedies on title and interim protection in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:43:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105842 Continued occupation of company accommodation after cessation of employment was treated as attracting Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, where the premises belonged to the company and had been allotted during service. The High Court declined revisional interference because the concurrent factual findings of the courts below showed no infirmity warranting reappraisal. At the same time, the occupants were granted further time to vacate the premises, with liberty to pursue civil remedies on title and interim protection in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105842