<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 851 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105838</link>
    <description>The court held that notice to the Central Government is not required at the initial stage of an application under section 391(1) for convening meetings but is necessary for applications under section 391(2) or section 394. The Central Government&#039;s role is to provide input on the final proposal, not the preliminary steps of convening meetings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 851 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105838</link>
      <description>The court held that notice to the Central Government is not required at the initial stage of an application under section 391(1) for convening meetings but is necessary for applications under section 391(2) or section 394. The Central Government&#039;s role is to provide input on the final proposal, not the preliminary steps of convening meetings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>