<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 849 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105835</link>
    <description>A proposed amalgamation scheme under the Companies Act, 1956 was sanctioned after shareholder approval in meetings convened under court directions, no-objection affidavits from the transferor-company&#039;s creditors and the transferee-company&#039;s lending institutions, and resolution of objections raised by the Registrar of Companies. The supporting affidavits showed that the authorised share capital had been increased, the transferor&#039;s holding in the transferee-company was liable to cancellation under the scheme, and the balance-sheet investment represented equity shares rather than debentures. The Official Liquidator reported that the companies&#039; affairs had not been conducted prejudicially to public interest, and no objections were received after publication, so the scheme was approved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 849 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105835</link>
      <description>A proposed amalgamation scheme under the Companies Act, 1956 was sanctioned after shareholder approval in meetings convened under court directions, no-objection affidavits from the transferor-company&#039;s creditors and the transferee-company&#039;s lending institutions, and resolution of objections raised by the Registrar of Companies. The supporting affidavits showed that the authorised share capital had been increased, the transferor&#039;s holding in the transferee-company was liable to cancellation under the scheme, and the balance-sheet investment represented equity shares rather than debentures. The Official Liquidator reported that the companies&#039; affairs had not been conducted prejudicially to public interest, and no objections were received after publication, so the scheme was approved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>