https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105820 A tribunal order passed after the same matter had already been disposed of earlier was treated as infructuous and unenforceable in law. The tribunal noted that an earlier order had already decided the issue, and the later hearing occurred because the case was mistakenly posted again due to a registry error. As both parties accepted that the earlier disposal barred enforcement of the later order, the tribunal recalled the subsequent order, vacated it, and declared it not enforceable. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:41:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105820 A tribunal order passed after the same matter had already been disposed of earlier was treated as infructuous and unenforceable in law. The tribunal noted that an earlier order had already decided the issue, and the later hearing occurred because the case was mistakenly posted again due to a registry error. As both parties accepted that the earlier disposal barred enforcement of the later order, the tribunal recalled the subsequent order, vacated it, and declared it not enforceable. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105820