https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105815 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as a remedy against wrongful retention of a company's property by a present or former employee after termination of service. The Calcutta High Court noted that where the company's entitlement to possession is clear and the civil challenge to termination has failed, pendency of the criminal prosecution does not by itself prevent restoration of possession. The article further states that the High Court's inherent powers may be used to prevent continued wrongful withholding and to secure vacating of company accommodation, even before the criminal trial concludes. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:21:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105815 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as a remedy against wrongful retention of a company's property by a present or former employee after termination of service. The Calcutta High Court noted that where the company's entitlement to possession is clear and the civil challenge to termination has failed, pendency of the criminal prosecution does not by itself prevent restoration of possession. The article further states that the High Court's inherent powers may be used to prevent continued wrongful withholding and to secure vacating of company accommodation, even before the criminal trial concludes. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105815