<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 461 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105814</link>
    <description>Penalty for omitting to file a classification list was held unwarranted where the goods were exempt from duty and no apparent benefit could be gained from the omission. The lapse was treated as inadvertent, and on that basis the penal provision was not attracted. The tribunal found it unnecessary to examine the remaining issues and set aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 461 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105814</link>
      <description>Penalty for omitting to file a classification list was held unwarranted where the goods were exempt from duty and no apparent benefit could be gained from the omission. The lapse was treated as inadvertent, and on that basis the penal provision was not attracted. The tribunal found it unnecessary to examine the remaining issues and set aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>