https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105804 Tax deducted at source under departmental directions had to be remitted to the revenue by the deducting corporation, because the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted amount was unaffected by any collateral dispute between the parties over ultimate entitlement to the supplies. The pendency of arbitration or any claim of overpayment did not excuse non-remittance, and the appellant could not be fastened with the same tax burden again after deduction from the consideration payable. Relief was granted to the extent that the balance of the deducted tax had to be remitted within the stipulated time, while the inter se dispute between the contracting parties remained untouched. en-us Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105804 Tax deducted at source under departmental directions had to be remitted to the revenue by the deducting corporation, because the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted amount was unaffected by any collateral dispute between the parties over ultimate entitlement to the supplies. The pendency of arbitration or any claim of overpayment did not excuse non-remittance, and the appellant could not be fastened with the same tax burden again after deduction from the consideration payable. Relief was granted to the extent that the balance of the deducted tax had to be remitted within the stipulated time, while the inter se dispute between the contracting parties remained untouched. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105804