<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 352 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105796</link>
    <description>A writ petition over deductions from running bills in a works contract was treated as unsuitable for writ jurisdiction because the dispute turned on construction of the subcontract, disputed facts, and a private law controversy between contracting parties; the petition was therefore not maintainable on the facts. The sales tax obligation to remit tax deducted at source was treated as a distinct statutory duty, separate from assessment of turnover tax, and could be enforced independently of the assessment proceedings. The matter was to be examined on the basis of the account books and supporting material, with coercive recovery under the assessment order kept in abeyance pending fresh scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 352 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105796</link>
      <description>A writ petition over deductions from running bills in a works contract was treated as unsuitable for writ jurisdiction because the dispute turned on construction of the subcontract, disputed facts, and a private law controversy between contracting parties; the petition was therefore not maintainable on the facts. The sales tax obligation to remit tax deducted at source was treated as a distinct statutory duty, separate from assessment of turnover tax, and could be enforced independently of the assessment proceedings. The matter was to be examined on the basis of the account books and supporting material, with coercive recovery under the assessment order kept in abeyance pending fresh scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>