https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105780 Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were considered in light of the appellants' admitted duty liability, financial hardship, and amounts already paid under protest. The Tribunal declined complete waiver, but granted partial relief by fixing a reduced pre-deposit requirement and protecting the appellants against recovery of the balance duty and penalty, subject to compliance with the deposit order. The operative effect was that stay was available only on meeting the directed pre-deposit, rather than by full exemption from deposit. en-us Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:46:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105780 Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were considered in light of the appellants' admitted duty liability, financial hardship, and amounts already paid under protest. The Tribunal declined complete waiver, but granted partial relief by fixing a reduced pre-deposit requirement and protecting the appellants against recovery of the balance duty and penalty, subject to compliance with the deposit order. The operative effect was that stay was available only on meeting the directed pre-deposit, rather than by full exemption from deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105780